<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rockland Progressive Dems &#187; Globalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rock-prog.org/category/national-politics/globalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rock-prog.org</link>
	<description>The information site of the Rockland Progressive Democratic Caucus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Major new trade legislation pending</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/06/major-new-trade-legislation-pending/</link>
		<comments>http://rock-prog.org/2009/06/major-new-trade-legislation-pending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliot Engel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nita Lowey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY-17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY-19]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TRADE Act sets a standard for where House Dems stand on trade and is a clear rejection of NAFTA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The TRADE Act </strong>(<strong>H.R.3012) </strong>sets a clear standard for where House Democrats are on trade and is a clear rejection of the NAFTA model.  It requires a comprehensive review of the economic impact of existing major trade deals, before any new ones are considered. It also stipulates environmental and labor standards and provisions for food and product safety and human rights protections that lawmakers say were omitted from previous trade deals and now must be included.</p>
<p><strong>It has 106 cosponsors in the house. None of our local representatives is on that list!</strong></p>
<p><strong>More at:</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR2009062403282.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR2009062403282.html</a></p>
<p><strong>and: </strong><a href="http://citizen.typepad.com/eyesontrade/">http://citizen.typepad.com/eyesontrade/</a></p>
<p><em>&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>The news and diaries posted on the Rockland Progressive Dems site are the  individual opinions of the members of the Rockland Progressive Democratic Caucus. They appear on this Web site to provide a progressive forum for Rockland County residents. While the Executive Committee of the caucus may edit some of these posts for clarity, length, and accuracy, it does not necessarily endorse the contents of each post. All members of the Rockland County Democratic Caucus are invited to share their viewpoints and comment on those viewpoints on this site.</em></p>
   ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rock-prog.org/2009/06/major-new-trade-legislation-pending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

