<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sen. Morahan comes out&#8230;against gay marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>The information site of the Rockland Progressive Democratic Caucus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 13:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morahan and &#8220;The Party of No&#8221; Defeat Marriage Equality Bill &#124; Nyack News and Views</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morahan and &#8220;The Party of No&#8221; Defeat Marriage Equality Bill &#124; Nyack News and Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=500#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] the Marriage Equailty bill before the State Senate. With Morahan&#8217;s passionate help (he came out strongly against gay marriage in July), the bill was defeated 24-38. While many Democrats gave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Marriage Equailty bill before the State Senate. With Morahan&#8217;s passionate help (he came out strongly against gay marriage in July), the bill was defeated 24-38. While many Democrats gave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyack News and Views &#187; A County Election that Really Matters</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyack News and Views &#187; A County Election that Really Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=500#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] the DSSC and other non-partisan statewide reform organizations to take notice. Morahan, who has recently taken a staunch anti-gay rights stance and who has been consistently against ethics and election reform in Albany, will finally meet a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the DSSC and other non-partisan statewide reform organizations to take notice. Morahan, who has recently taken a staunch anti-gay rights stance and who has been consistently against ethics and election reform in Albany, will finally meet a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A county election that really matters &#124; Rockland Progressive Dems - The information site of the Rockland Progressive Democratic Caucus</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>A county election that really matters &#124; Rockland Progressive Dems - The information site of the Rockland Progressive Democratic Caucus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=500#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] the DSSC and other non-partisan statewide reform organizations to take notice. Morahan, who has recently taken a staunch anti-gay rights stance and who has been consistently against ethics and election reform in Albany, will finally meet a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the DSSC and other non-partisan statewide reform organizations to take notice. Morahan, who has recently taken a staunch anti-gay rights stance and who has been consistently against ethics and election reform in Albany, will finally meet a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyack News and Views &#187; State Senator Morahan Says No To Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyack News and Views &#187; State Senator Morahan Says No To Gay Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=500#comment-170</guid>
		<description>[...] Rock Progressive Dems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rock Progressive Dems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevebret</title>
		<link>http://rock-prog.org/2009/07/morahan-comes-out-against-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>stevebret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rock-prog.org/?p=500#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Cliff, thanks for the heads up. 

I am angry. I wrote (pen &amp; paper) to Morahan and spoke to his office twice over the past several weeks urging him to support marriage equality. I didn&#039;t expect his enthusiastic support but I had hoped that he would, at the end of the day, do the right and just thing. What angers me is the tone of his rationale: in his own words, “I know my community is divided. If you can accommodate both sides, why not do that?”

How would the Senator have voted forty years ago over the issue of white only/black only drinking fountains? Would he quip &quot;no problem, both sides are accommodated&quot;?

Sen. Morahan, I ask you this question: If tomorrow, the community became divided over your flavor of domestic arrangement; asked you and your wife to trade in your dusty old marriage certificate for a freshly minted civil union document... would you do so? I think not.

I urge everyone to call this man and let him know you feelings.

—Steve Bretschneider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff, thanks for the heads up. </p>
<p>I am angry. I wrote (pen &amp; paper) to Morahan and spoke to his office twice over the past several weeks urging him to support marriage equality. I didn&#8217;t expect his enthusiastic support but I had hoped that he would, at the end of the day, do the right and just thing. What angers me is the tone of his rationale: in his own words, “I know my community is divided. If you can accommodate both sides, why not do that?”</p>
<p>How would the Senator have voted forty years ago over the issue of white only/black only drinking fountains? Would he quip &#8220;no problem, both sides are accommodated&#8221;?</p>
<p>Sen. Morahan, I ask you this question: If tomorrow, the community became divided over your flavor of domestic arrangement; asked you and your wife to trade in your dusty old marriage certificate for a freshly minted civil union document&#8230; would you do so? I think not.</p>
<p>I urge everyone to call this man and let him know you feelings.</p>
<p>—Steve Bretschneider</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
